News Made Clear · Laden…
A separate calculation reported by the BBC suggests the proposed pension change would have saved £9bn a year had it applied since 2011.
Wat is er gewijzigd? · 29-09-2026, 17:07 UTC
Terug naar de gekozen leestaal
Beoordelingsinformatie wordt opgehaald.
BBC News described the address as Andy Burnham’s first Labour conference speech as prime minister. Burnham said the government would end the pensions triple lock and proposed funding a new national care service from pension savings from 2030. That date relates to funding for the care service, not to when the triple lock would end. [1]
Burnham linked his determination to create the service to the recent death of his father, saying he wanted to honour his memory. [1]
Burnham also announced a plan to lift the ban on public ownership of water companies and proposed a change to the UK’s electoral system. [1]
Andy Burnham has set out how he would replace the state pension triple lock from April 2030, alongside plans for water-company ownership and electoral reform. [2]
In his Labour conference speech, the prime minister said he would keep the triple lock until the end of the current Parliament. Under his proposed formula, the state pension would then rise each year by inflation or 2.5%, whichever is higher. It would receive additional increases in some years if needed to keep pace with average worker earnings. Burnham said the change would generate significant savings to help fund a National Care Service in England. [2]
Burnham also proposed legislation later this year to repeal what he called a ban on public ownership of water companies. He described a 10-year path towards a different water system, but made no explicit commitment to renationalise the companies. [2]
On electoral reform, Burnham announced a national commission and said Labour would enter the next election with a manifesto commitment to change the voting system. [2]
Government sources forecast savings of around £15bn a year by 2040 from changing the UK state pension’s triple lock, BBC economics editor Faisal Islam reported on 29 September. Under Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s plan, annual pension increases would follow whichever is higher: inflation or 2.5%. Average earnings growth would no longer set the yearly rise, and MPs would have to vote on the change.
3 vermelde bronnen · bekijk bewijs, beperkingen en bronketens.
Log in om dit artikel een duimpje omhoog of omlaag te geven.
Besloten testdiscussie. Reacties zijn meningen van lezers en worden nog niet automatisch op feiten gecontroleerd. Bewerken kan tot 60 seconden na plaatsing.
De volgorde geldt voor hoofdreacties; antwoorden staan daaronder van oud naar nieuw. Nieuwe reacties en likes kunnen de volgorde wijzigen. Ververs voor de actuele rangschikking.
Reacties laden…
Islam also reported an Institute for Fiscal Studies calculation that the change would have saved £9bn a year if it had applied since 2011, more than halving the triple lock’s annual £16bn cost. That retrospective calculation covers a different period from the government sources’ 2040 forecast. Islam expects savings to be smaller in the next few years than over the coming decades. [3]