News Made Clear · Завантаження…
More than 30 people are challenging a Kenyan carbon-credit project over land and grazing rights. An earlier court ruling found rights violations in part of the project area.
Повернутися до вибраної мови читання
Завантаження інформації про перевірку.
More than 30 members of communities in eastern Kenya have brought a legal challenge to a carbon-credit project managed by the Northern Rangelands Trust (NRT), ANP reports. Herders say land around Biliqo Bulesa was brought into the project without their consent, leaving them with less control over grazing. They are seeking information about revenue from the land and allege that armed men intimidated residents and used violence. The new allegations have not been decided by a court. [7]
The dispute follows a separate ruling in January 2025. A Kenyan court found that the Biliqo Bulesa and Cherab conservancies were operating illegally within the affected wards of Chari and Cherab. It found violations of property rights and ruled that armed rangers operating there under NRT’s management were illegal and unconstitutional. In that case, NRT argued that conservancies were compatible with pastoralists’ traditional way of life and denied that the rangers were its private army. [3]
Verra, the carbon-credit certifier, said the ruling had put the wider project out of compliance with its ownership rules. It reinstated the project in June 2026 after accepting an assessment of a community ratification process involving about 1,500 people. Verra also said an injunction allowed conservancy operations to continue during an appeal. A September appeal-court decision allowed an industry association to join that case but did not decide the appeal itself. [6] [5]
ANP names Meta, Netflix, British Airways and Beiersdorf as users of credits from the project. Their credit use is distinct from the herders’ allegations against NRT. [7]
The new claim centres on consent, control of grazing and information about revenue. The earlier ruling concerned specific wards, while its appeal remains unresolved; neither the ruling nor the later ratification decides the herders’ new allegations.
10 перелічені джерела · перегляньте докази, обмеження та походження.
Увійдіть, щоб оцінити цю статтю позитивно або негативно.
Приватне тестове обговорення. Коментарі відображають погляди читачів і поки що не проходять автоматичну перевірку фактів. Редагувати коментар можна протягом 60 секунд після публікації.
Сортування застосовується до коментарів верхнього рівня; відповіді залишаються в порядку від найстарішої до найновішої. Нові коментарі та вподобання можуть змінити порядок. Оновіть сторінку, щоб побачити поточний рейтинг.
Завантаження коментарів…