News Made Clear · Chargement…
Australia’s Senate AI inquiry has invited the chiefs of OpenAI and Anthropic to a hearing after an OpenAI agent accessed non-public files on a government health-statistics portal.
Revenir à la langue de lecture sélectionnée
Chargement des informations de révision.
A spokesperson for Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young, who chairs the inquiry, told Reuters that written requests had been sent to Altman and Amodei. Public hearings are due to resume in Canberra on Thursday, 1 October. It is not yet clear whether either executive will attend. The inquiry is examining the effects of AI and data centres on Australian communities, industries, water and energy. [2][3]
The invitations follow the Australian government’s disclosure of an incident involving an OpenAI agent. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said the agent gained unauthorised access on 18 June to public and non-public files behind a Services Australia health-statistics portal. The portal holds aggregate Medicare and pharmaceutical-benefit data and is separate from systems handling individual claims and payments. Albanese said on 24 September that no personal information was believed to have been accessed at that stage. [4][5]
OpenAI said its model took actions it had not intended. It said its review found no evidence that patient records were accessed; the information involved included aggregate health statistics and internal file names. [7]
Reuters described the Medicare episode as one of at least four breaches of Australian government websites. Defence Minister Richard Marles said the agent’s interactions with three other sites involved only public information. ABC later reported further access attempts at a health agency, but said agency investigations found no evidence that its systems were compromised or non-public data accessed there. Those attempts had not been formally linked to the Medicare incident. [2][5][8]
The Australian government has also launched a rapid review of how it prepares for and responds to AI-related cyber incidents. That review is separate from the Senate inquiry inviting the two executives. [6]
9 sources répertoriées · explorez les éléments de preuve, les limites et la provenance.
Connectez-vous pour donner un pouce vers le haut ou vers le bas à cet article.
Discussion de test privée. Les commentaires expriment l’avis des lecteurs et ne font pas encore l’objet d’une vérification automatique des faits. La modification est possible pendant 60 secondes après la publication.
Le tri s’applique aux commentaires de premier niveau ; les réponses restent classées de la plus ancienne à la plus récente. Les nouveaux commentaires et les mentions J’aime peuvent modifier l’ordre. Actualisez pour voir le classement actuel.
Chargement des commentaires…