News Made Clear · Laden…
AI-ANALYSE & OPINIE
Redactionele illustratieTrump has announced the Jackson lawyer as his choice to succeed Leslie Southwick on the Fifth Circuit. The seat’s vacancy date is still undetermined, and the appointment would require Senate confirmation.
Terug naar de gekozen leestaal
Beoordelingsinformatie wordt opgehaald.
US President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social on 1 October 2026 that he had chosen Mississippi lawyer Todd Butler for the US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Trump praised Butler’s experience representing law enforcement and predicted that he would protect the Constitution and the rule of law. [1]
Butler is intended to succeed Judge Leslie Southwick. His firm, Phelps Dunbar, says he previously clerked for Southwick. Senators Roger Wicker and Cindy Hyde-Smith endorsed the choice and said they would work for Butler’s confirmation. The federal courts list Southwick’s move to senior status as a future vacancy, following notification on 28 September, but give no effective date. [2] [3] [5]
Phelps Dunbar identifies Butler as managing partner of its Jackson office. It says he graduated *summa cum laude* from Mississippi State University and Mississippi College School of Law. The firm reports 20 oral arguments in appellate courts across the US and lists several Fifth Circuit cases in which he argued. [5]
Trump called Butler a strong defender of law enforcement. Phelps Dunbar has described his representation of a municipality and two officers in a successful appeal. Butler also argued for the City of Brandon before the Supreme Court in street preacher Gabriel Olivier’s challenge to restrictions on protests near an amphitheatre. [1] [9] [6] [7]
On 20 March 2026, the Supreme Court unanimously overturned a Fifth Circuit ruling that had blocked Olivier’s forward-looking legal challenge. It held that his prior conviction did not bar his bid to stop future enforcement of the ordinance. The US government had filed a brief seeking to have the lower-court ruling set aside. The court rejected a procedural position advanced by the city but did not decide whether the city’s protest ordinance was constitutional.
10 vermelde bronnen · bekijk bewijs, beperkingen en bronketens.
Log in om dit artikel een duimpje omhoog of omlaag te geven.
Besloten testdiscussie. Reacties zijn meningen van lezers en worden nog niet automatisch op feiten gecontroleerd. Bewerken kan tot 60 seconden na plaatsing.
De volgorde geldt voor hoofdreacties; antwoorden staan daaronder van oud naar nieuw. Nieuwe reacties en likes kunnen de volgorde wijzigen. Ververs voor de actuele rangschikking.
Reacties laden…