News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…

The Dutch cybersecurity centre says exploiting two PHP vulnerabilities is more difficult than initially thought, reducing the assessed risk of large-scale attacks. It says patches for the flaws appear to be working so far.
Review information is loading.
The Dutch National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) says the risk of large-scale attacks exploiting two recently disclosed PHP vulnerabilities is lower than it first estimated, after further investigation found that exploiting them is complicated.
Many websites in the Netherlands use PHP. The flaws came to light earlier this week, and numerous sites were taken offline as a precaution on Wednesday while operators installed a patch released by the PHP Foundation. Many have since returned online. The NCSC says the updates appear to be working so far.
The centre also reported that the PHP Foundation disclosed another vulnerability on Friday. The foundation considers it unlikely that the flaw could be used to take control of devices remotely, according to the NCSC. The issue is due to be fixed in a future routine update.
The NCSC had previously reported attempted attacks on the first vulnerabilities, but no successful exploitation. It has warned that attacks could still become possible if a working method is developed. Its earlier update on the PHP flaws said researchers and attackers had shared test or exploit code, but the centre’s investigation had not found that code to work successfully.
1 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.