News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…

The cabinet has urged Dutch MPs to reject a tax amendment backed by four parties, saying much of its proposed €1 billion wealth-tax increase is not specified and worker tax cuts would come before the revenue.
Review information is loading.
The Dutch cabinet has advised MPs to reject a tax-plan amendment backed by PRO, Volt, D66 and CDA, arguing that its funding is not sufficiently specified and that tax relief for workers would begin before the proposed wealth-tax revenue arrives.
In a letter, State Secretary for Finance Eelco Eerenberg said more than €400 million of the plan’s intended €1 billion increase in taxes on wealth would come from tackling tax-avoidance arrangements, but only one such measure was named in detail.
He also objected to the timing: the parties want to reduce taxes on workers next year, while the additional revenue from taxing wealth would come later. The cabinet’s objection is about the proposal’s financial coverage, rather than political opposition to its aims, the report said.
The assessment was not wholly negative. Eerenberg said the proposal was more than adequately funded over the long term and that the proposed millionaires’ tax in box 3, covering savings and investments, could be implemented from 2029, although it would make the system more complex.
The proposal followed a deal between PRO, Volt, D66 and CDA to raise €1 billion through a millionaires’ tax and measures against avoidance of inheritance and gift tax. The House had reopened debate on the 2027 tax plan after the parties reached that deal.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.