News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…

ECB Supervisory Board member Pedro Machado says Europe should ease the reporting and supervisory burden on smaller banks, but argues that weakening capital standards is not the answer to the competitiveness gap facing the sector.
Review information is loading.
Pedro Machado, a member of the European Central Bank’s Supervisory Board, has called for simpler, more proportionate rules for smaller banks while arguing that Europe should not weaken capital standards to improve the competitiveness of its largest lenders.
In a speech in Frankfurt on Tuesday, Machado said the bigger obstacle to European banks’ competitiveness was a market still divided along national lines. He pointed to technology’s rising fixed costs as a reason for banks to gain scale through cross-border integration or domestic consolidation, rather than looser regulation.
His remarks set out the ECB’s case for separating targeted simplification from demands to reduce capital requirements. Machado said smaller banks faced a disproportionate burden from compliance costs, while complex rules could also give larger banks more scope to exploit differences in how risks are measured.
Machado cited ECB analysis of responses to a European Commission consultation, which grouped requests for change into five themes: simpler buffers and rules, proportionality, minimum capital requirements, external competitiveness and reporting burdens.
Among the largest banks, nearly a third of the issues raised concerned external competitiveness, particularly comparison with US peers; almost a fifth concerned minimum capital requirements. For small banks, nearly half of the issues concerned proportionality and more than a third reporting burdens, Machado said.
He argued that these are distinct concerns: small lenders want rules and reporting scaled to their size and risks, while many large banks are seeking relief from capital requirements. The analysis covered 100 of 217 respondents who had made a clear request for change, with each respondent weighted equally.
For smaller lenders, Machado outlined proposals to widen the existing category of small and non-complex institutions. Supervisors could raise the threshold for inclusion from €5 billion to as much as €10 billion in assets, and change the test of whether a bank is non-complex. The ECB estimates that up to 85% of less significant institutions could then qualify, around 150 more than today.
The proposals would also allow some smaller banks to go two to three years without a full supervisory review where their risk profile permits. From 2027, a dedicated reporting category could reduce the data points required from these banks from about 13,500 to roughly 700, Machado said. Supervisors would retain discretion to examine risks more closely when needed.
He stressed that lighter procedures should not mean weaker safeguards. Smaller banks face risks including cyber threats and climate change, he said, and proportionality should remain within the EU’s common rulebook and be backed by a credible crisis-management framework.
1 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.
Machado challenged the argument that European banks generally face higher capital requirements than US competitors. An ECB staff comparison, using end-2025 figures, estimated that the largest euro-area banks would need around 8% more minimum Common Equity Tier 1 capital under US rules, while smaller significant institutions would need somewhat less, around 5%. The estimates concern minimum requirements and exclude the leverage ratio.
He acknowledged that particular rules can affect competition in areas such as leveraged lending, securitisation and market-making. But he argued against lowering overall capital standards, saying research suggests that reducing requirements can support lending during downturns, while its effect in normal times is small. He also said stronger capital can support lending over the medium term by lowering banks’ funding costs.
The speech pointed to a marked gap in cross-border lending: about 14% of euro-area business credit comes from a bank whose ultimate parent is in another euro-area country, compared with at least 45% of US business credit crossing state lines. Machado said national legal differences and an incomplete banking union remain barriers to integration.
He also cited rising technology costs, including spending on digital systems, cloud services and cybersecurity, and said artificial intelligence could further increase the advantages of scale. Greater scale, he cautioned, also raises the stakes if a bank fails; it should not be achieved through weaker supervision or resolution rules.
Machado’s speech follows earlier ECB calls to make supervision more proportionate for smaller banks and to address fragmentation in Europe’s banking market. The proposals he described would simplify the existing framework, while leaving decisions about changes to the rules and their implementation to the relevant authorities.