News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…

The planned review covers a wider fund that lent more than £1 billion to about 50 developers.
Produced with in-depth AI research, source-based writing and a language correction. Sources and uncertainties accompany the article.
Review information is loading.
A Greater Manchester scrutiny committee is to examine a housing loan fund that lent about £55 million to three property companies ultimately controlled by Manchester City owner Sheikh Mansour. The planned review was reported by The Guardian in October.
The loans were made in 2017, when Andy Burnham, now prime minister, was mayor of Greater Manchester. Burnham chaired two meetings at which the loans were approved, but the decisions were made publicly by all members of the Greater Manchester Combined Authority (GMCA), not by him alone, the BBC reported.
The loans formed part of a much larger programme. The Greater Manchester Housing Investment Loan Fund began in 2015 with £300 million in government funding and has lent more than £1 billion to about 50 developers, according to the BBC.
Committee chair John Leech has questioned the transparency of the approval process and why apparently successful businesses needed to borrow public money. His comments to the BBC were reported by The Guardian. The BBC said there was no suggestion of wrongdoing in relation to the loans.
The GMCA said it was supporting the committee’s inquiries. It told The Guardian that lending decisions were taken publicly, the fund was open to developers who met its criteria, and no viable scheme had been turned down.
3 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.