News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…

The prime minister says he will consider changes to how rape trials are conducted after Russell Brand’s conviction. The BBC reports that there are no plans to change the law.
Produced with in-depth AI research, source-based writing and a language correction. Sources and uncertainties accompany the article.
Review information is loading.
Speaking to Times Radio, the prime minister said the government needed to keep examining how rape trials are conducted so that women do not feel they are the ones on trial. He said he was prepared to make changes and wanted more women to come forward and report rape.
His comments followed the conviction of actor and comedian Russell Brand for one count of rape and three counts of sexual assault. Brand was also found not guilty of two further rape charges and one count of attempted indecent assault. He is due to be sentenced on Monday.
Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley said that what he had heard reported from the trial came close to “victim blaming”. During the trial, Brand’s defence barrister, Ian Winter KC, told the court that none of the complainants had “resisted or screamed or even tried to leave”.
Rowley backed Victims’ Commissioner Claire Waxman’s call for a legal duty requiring judges to direct juries in every rape trial about myths and misconceptions. Waxman said assumptions that victims must scream, physically resist or immediately report an offence were harmful.
Burnham said he would look closely at Rowley’s comments and, when asked about changing the law, said he “wouldn’t rule anything out”. The BBC reported that it understood there were no plans to change the law around rape trials. A Ministry of Justice spokesperson told the Guardian that judges could already give directions to counter rape myths and that the department would carefully consider Waxman’s proposals.
Barrister and former Conservative MP Anna Soubry challenged Rowley’s comments, telling the BBC that judges must and do give firm directions on these issues in such cases. A 2025 Law Commission report on England and Wales, however, concluded that directions on rape myths could be given more consistently and recommended further guidance.
3 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.