News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…
Approval for North Sea gas field Jackdaw has triggered a row at Westminster over climate policy, energy costs and how the decision was reached.
Review information is loading.
The UK government’s approval of North Sea gas production at Jackdaw has prompted a political dispute over energy costs, climate policy and how the project was handled.
At Prime Minister’s Questions, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch accused the government of dithering, noting that a Conservative government first approved the project in 2022. Andy Burnham said the Tories had not carried out the process “properly” and described the current government’s choice as a “pragmatic decision”, according to the BBC.
Jackdaw’s approval followed a court ruling that overturned its earlier consent because the assessment had not accounted for emissions from burning the gas. The government has since completed a new decision process. The BBC’s video report focuses on the opposing political claims; it does not set out the project’s expected effect on household bills or emissions.
The decision adds to debate over whether further North Sea production can support energy security while meeting climate goals. The government expects Jackdaw to provide a modest increase in domestic gas output, but its approval does not mean the gas will reduce consumer prices: the government’s assessment says the project is not expected to materially affect energy prices or bills.
Jackdaw’s approval is also distinct from a decision on Rosebank, another North Sea development, which remains pending. The row over Jackdaw is therefore both about the project itself and the government’s wider approach to new oil and gas production.
1 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.