News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…

The seller recovered almost £6,000 in sales proceeds after filing a claim, but a separate court award for costs remains contested.
Produced with in-depth AI research, source-based writing and a language correction. Sources and uncertainties accompany the article.
Review information is loading.
A Vinted seller who was unable to withdraw almost £6,000 from the resale platform has regained access to her earnings after taking legal action, the BBC reports. A separate court award for her costs remains unpaid and is being challenged by Vinted and payment company Mangopay.
The professional seller, Mali, told the BBC that verification kept failing after she reported an error in the name on her account. After eight weeks without access to the money, she brought a small claims case against both companies, paying £455 in court fees. She said her account was verified three days after the claim was filed, allowing her to withdraw the sales proceeds.
Mali continued the case to seek court fees, other costs and interest. In June, she obtained a default judgment ordering the companies to pay £1,207.50 after neither responded to her claim, according to the BBC. Both have applied to have the judgment set aside, with a hearing scheduled for December. The judgment was made in the absence of a response from the companies.
Vinted told the BBC that Mali’s documents did not match the name on her account and that it had since helped her update it. It did not respond to the broadcaster’s questions about the legal action. Mangopay said professional secrecy and data protection obligations prevented it from commenting on individual cases.
Vinted says its payment providers carry out identity and business checks and can prevent withdrawals while an identity check is being completed.
Another sportswear seller, Azri Mukthar, told the BBC he had been trying to withdraw almost £2,500 for more than a year and had repeatedly submitted the requested documents. Vinted said he had not supplied all the required documents and that its support team was in contact with him.
2 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.