News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…

England’s higher education regulator says some university assessments can be completed to a high standard with AI in minutes, raising questions about whether they reliably test students’ own knowledge and skills.
Review information is loading.
The higher education regulator in England says students can complete some university assessments to a high standard using AI in minutes, raising concerns about whether those tests still measure students’ own knowledge and skills.
The Office for Students (OfS) said many assessments are unsupervised and AI use can be difficult to detect reliably. Its research, conducted with Advance HE, drew on views from 244 university staff and 91 students at at least 127 institutions. The findings describe risks reported by participants, rather than measuring how often students use AI across the sector.
The OfS said it had heard of cases in which students completed whole assessments in minutes using AI and received grades similar to those of students who did not. It also reported that some staff were seeing assignments that looked alike and questioned whether their institution’s assessments remained fit for purpose.
OfS strategy and delivery director Josh Fleming called for “far greater use of AI-free assessment”. He said AI posed a risk to students’ learning and universities’ ability to assess them. The regulator identified closed-book and practical exams as the most effective forms of assessment.
Universities UK, which represents more than 140 institutions, said many universities had made substantial changes, including more in-person exams, presentations, oral examinations and assessments that incorporate AI under controlled conditions. It said approaches should vary by subject.
The OfS says universities that fail to meet its quality standards could face restrictions on raising tuition fees or limits on student numbers under proposals now being consulted on. It also says that if an assessment can be completed using AI without demonstrating the skills it is meant to test, it should be replaced.
1 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.