News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…

Therapists say the popular labels can help people discuss what they value in a relationship, but warn against treating them as fixed categories or demands.
Produced with in-depth AI research, source-based writing and a language correction. Sources and uncertainties accompany the article.
Review information is loading.
Love languages can give couples a way to talk about what makes them feel valued, but the five labels can also oversimplify relationships, psychotherapist Georgina Sturmer has told the BBC.
The idea comes from American pastor and relationship counsellor Gary Chapman’s 1992 book, *The 5 Love Languages*. His categories are words of affirmation, quality time, receiving gifts, acts of service and physical touch. Chapman developed the concept from observations made while counselling couples.
Counselling psychologist Sarah Emmerson told the BBC that couples frequently bring the labels into sessions. She said research offers little support for the idea that there are only five ways to show love and that everyone fits neatly into those categories.
That does not mean talking about preferences is pointless. Sturmer said the framework can help people reflect on what they and their partners enjoy in a relationship, even though she considers it “hugely limited”.
She also warned that a label could be used to pressure a partner: someone might say that, because their love language is physical touch, their partner must always be physically intimate with them.
Chapman has distinguished physical touch from sex. In a 2019 interview with Vice, he said it could include non-sexual gestures such as holding hands or placing a hand on a partner’s shoulder.
Writing in Psychology Today in 2025, psychotherapist and sex therapist Marty Klein offered another way to approach the labels: treat them as preferences rather than demands. For example, someone might say “I prefer to get gifts” rather than “I have to get gifts”, he wrote.
4 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.