News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…

The Pentagon says it has stopped using Anthropic’s AI, but reports of use last week and an earlier migration estimate leave the final switch-off date unclear.
Review information is loading.
The Pentagon says it has stopped using Anthropic’s AI products, months after a phase-out was announced. An unnamed defence official told the BBC on Monday that use had ceased, but did not say when the last systems were switched off or spell out the statement’s coverage of contractor-operated systems. [1]
People familiar with the matter told the BBC that Anthropic’s Claude model was still being used as recently as the previous week for research, intelligence work and military operations against Iran. Those accounts concern use before Monday’s statement; they do not establish use after the Pentagon’s unspecified cutoff. The BBC’s sources also described intelligence analysis using Claude through Palantir’s Maven system. [1]
That Maven account sits alongside an earlier Pentagon assessment. On 10 September, research chief Emil Michael estimated that roughly 90% of the move away from Anthropic in classified military systems was complete. He said Maven and Palantir work had moved off Anthropic months earlier. His estimate did not specify which systems were counted, while the BBC’s Maven account did not date each use, leaving it unclear whether the two descriptions concern the same deployments and period. [2] [1]
Donald Trump announced a six-month phase-out in February. A subsequent Pentagon memorandum called for Anthropic products to be removed as soon as practical and within 180 days, and barred contractors from using them for department work. The instruction set a requirement; it did not record when the transition was completed. [4] [3]
The dispute has also reached the courts. A California judge ruled against broader government measures affecting Anthropic in August but said the government could still lawfully end its contracts. In September, a separate appeals court rejected Anthropic’s challenge to a procurement exclusion. Neither decision establishes when Claude was last used. [4]
8 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.