News Made Clear · Loading…
AI ANALYSIS & OPINION
Editorial illustrationSouth Korea has selected a Texas power project, but the larger nuclear and Alaska LNG proposals in Trump’s $200bn announcement still face significant decisions.
What has changed? · 01/10/2026, 17:26 UTC
Review information is loading.
In a Truth Social post on 30 September 2026, President Donald Trump said the US and South Korea had agreed to launch $200bn in energy investments under their earlier $350bn trade and investment deal. The proposed projects sit within a $200bn strategic investment commitment announced in November 2025, rather than adding $200bn to it. That earlier agreement also included a separate $150bn commitment for shipbuilding. [1] [2] [7]
Trump listed eight nuclear reactors, an Alaska liquefied natural gas project and a gas-fired power plant in Encinal, Texas. The figures in his post — $120bn, $50bn and $22bn — add up to $192bn, $8bn short of the stated $200bn total. [1]
The Texas project is the furthest along in the announcements. Developers have been selected for the plant, which is planned to produce about 6.47 gigawatts of electricity. It would supply an adjacent data-centre campus and send excess power to the grid. Construction remains subject to permits and approvals, while a power-purchase agreement is expected to be finalised in 2027. South Korea’s selection of the project had been reported before Trump’s post. [4] [7] [8]
The nuclear announcement sets out a framework for six Westinghouse AP1000 reactors and two Korean-designed APR1400 reactors. South Korean industry minister Kim Jung-kwan said decisions on individual projects would follow work on sites, schedules, commercial viability and parliamentary procedures. The reported $120bn ceiling includes $20bn in contingency reserves. Seoul will likewise decide whether to proceed with the Alaska LNG project after commercial and legal reviews. Trump said the countries would begin working together on Alaska. [1] [7]
18 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Trump forecast tens of thousands of American jobs. [1] The Texas developers estimate 8,400 jobs at peak construction; Alaska LNG developer Glenfarne forecast 12,000 construction jobs in June for that project as a whole, before Seoul’s current participation review. [4] [5] [7] South Korea’s rules cap funding under the agreement at $20bn a year and generally require projects to be commercially viable. [2] [3]
The US and South Korea have selected a $22.3bn gas-fired power project in Texas as their first strategic investment project. Two larger proposals in the $200bn energy package promoted by Donald Trump are less advanced: the nuclear framework is non-binding, and South Korea has yet to decide whether or how much to invest in Alaska LNG. [11] [14] [16]
In a Truth Social message posted on 30 September 2026 and reposted later that evening, Trump said the countries had agreed to launch $200bn of investments under a $350bn trade and investment deal reached the previous year. He listed a $120bn programme for eight nuclear reactors, a $50bn Alaska LNG project and a roughly $22bn power project in Texas, and forecast tens of thousands of American jobs. His wording on Alaska was narrower: the countries had agreed to begin working together. [10] [1]
The $200bn is the strategic-investment portion of the existing $350bn package, which also includes $150bn for shipbuilding. Under the terms published in 2025, South Korea cannot be required to provide more than $20bn in any year. Its industry ministry describes the latest projects as steps towards putting that earlier agreement into effect, rather than another $200bn on top of it. [11] [2]
The Texas project, known as Project Star, is planned to generate 6,472 megawatts, chiefly for an adjacent data-centre campus; its developers say excess electricity would go to the grid. South Korea’s industry ministry targets initial operation in 2029 and full operation in 2032. The developers estimate 8,400 jobs at peak construction and about 170 permanent jobs at the power campus, with hundreds more at the data centre. [11] [13]
For nuclear power, Cameco describes a framework for up to eight reactors, including six Westinghouse AP1000 units and up to two Korean APR1400 units. Sites, financing, approvals and final agreements remain to be settled. South Korea says $20bn of the proposed $120bn nuclear funding is a contingency that would count towards the strategic-investment total even if it went unused. [11] [14]
On Alaska, South Korea says it has agreed to review the LNG project and will decide whether to proceed after commercial and legal checks. Developer Glenfarne welcomed the proposed investment but said its structure and a final investment decision still needed work. Reuters reported that South Korea’s industry minister objected to the White House’s account of the announcement, saying it went beyond what had been agreed. The amounts Trump listed total roughly $192bn and include both proposed project costs and funding limits. [11] [15] [16]