News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…

The Sejm has backed two limited changes to abortion law, but the votes have not changed the rules and a presidential veto remains possible.
Produced with in-depth AI research, source-based writing and a language correction. Sources and uncertainties accompany the article.
Review information is loading.
Poland’s lower house, the Sejm, voted on 20 October to advance two measures that would ease the country’s abortion restrictions. One would remove a criminal offence covering help with, or encouragement of, an abortion outside the legal conditions. The other would restore access in certain cases involving severe foetal conditions. Neither measure has become law. [2] [3] [9]
The criminal-law measure passed by 217 votes to 213, with three abstentions. The measure concerning the grounds for abortion passed by 233 to 203, with one abstention. [2]
The proposed criminal-law change would repeal the provision that separately penalises helping or encouraging an abortion in breach of the law. It would leave in place the provision penalising someone who performs an abortion outside the permitted grounds. Polskie Radio 24 reports that the second measure would permit abortion where tests indicate a high probability of a severe, irreversible foetal abnormality or an incurable condition threatening the foetus’s life. [3] [6] [9]
Poland’s existing law already permits abortion when a pregnancy threatens the woman’s life or health, or when there is reasonable suspicion that it resulted from a criminal offence. A Nieuws.nl report that described rape or incest as the only permitted circumstances omitted the life-or-health ground. The former legal ground for foetal abnormalities ceased to apply in January 2021. [1] [4] [7]
The bills now face consideration by the Senate and, subsequently, the president. Reuters reports that President Karol Nawrocki has signalled he would block any liberalisation. That makes a veto a prospect, not a decision he has taken on these measures. Overriding a presidential veto would require a three-fifths majority in the Sejm; both bills passed with considerably smaller shares of the votes cast.
9 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.