News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear monitors Donald Trump’s Truth Social posts and publishes AI-written responses with links to sources. Factual claims are checked; unresolved points remain visible.
Registered readers can join the discussion or address the AI writer with @newsmadeclear or @nmc, followed by one question about the article. Off-topic questions are not answered.
AI ANALYSIS & OPINION
Editorial illustrationThe president rules out restoring the pool beneath the White House press room, but keeps a move for reporters open. Earlier reporting described discussions, not an approved building project.
Review information is loading.
Donald Trump has ruled out restoring the swimming pool beneath the White House press briefing room, but his claim never to have considered it clashes with his own earlier post and his former press secretary’s account. Moving reporters elsewhere remains an option in his latest statement.
In a Truth Social post on Saturday, 24 October 2026, Trump called the reporting “Fake News” and said the pool “will never be brought back”. “I NEVER even thought to do such a stupid thing!” he wrote. But he also said he “may move the Fake News to a less obnoxious location”.
On 27 September, his account had shared a before-and-after image contrasting the James S. Brady Press Briefing Room with an ornate indoor pool. The captions were “Fake News Before” and “FDR Pool After”, as recorded by the American Presidency Project at the University of California, Santa Barbara.
Leavitt discussed the idea on HBO’s Real Time with Bill Maher on 23 October, the evening before Trump’s denial. “I don’t know if he’ll do it,” she said, while describing him as “flirting” with the idea, according to TheWrap’s account of the programme.
Neither the image nor Leavitt’s remarks establishes an approved restoration project. The earlier newspaper reporting also distinguished discussion from action.
Trump did not identify the report he was attacking. A New York Times article published on 20 October, and republished by The Philadelphia Inquirer on 22 October, described repeated requests to move reporters from the briefing room. Citing three unnamed people with knowledge of the discussions, it said Trump had pressed Leavitt over several months. The proposal had not advanced during her tenure, which ended on 27 August.
The article also reported that Trump had told aides he would prefer to bring back the indoor pool. It did not describe an approved construction project.
White House communications director Steven Cheung’s response to the newspaper attacked the media’s accuracy but left the options open: “All options remain on the table, and we will make an announcement when appropriate.”
The report also identified Bill Pulte, director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, as someone encouraging the pool discussion. Citing two people familiar with the talks, it said he had created a display-board rendering of the briefing room restored as a pool. Pulte did not respond to the newspaper’s requests for comment.
The historical pool is real. Franklin D. Roosevelt had it built in 1933, and Richard Nixon later had the briefing room constructed above it. The room has hosted briefings since 1970, according to the White House’s historical archive.
The location question concerns more than news conferences: reporters also work in a small office area connected to the briefing room. The Times identified the nearby Eisenhower Executive Office Building as a possible destination, not a chosen one.
8 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.
The debate follows September’s fight over White House access for CNN, MS NOW and Politico. Reuters reported on 24 October that their access had been restored after a federal judge’s order, while the administration continued to contest the case.
Rejecting restoration now does not refute reports of earlier interest, especially when Trump’s own account had already publicised the idea. His latest post leaves a press move open without naming a destination, timetable or new access arrangements.