News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…
The exchange says the campaign led to an attack affecting about $6.3 billion in digital assets. Its account is preliminary and will be subject to independent review.
What has changed? · 03/11/2026, 17:54 UTC
Produced with in-depth AI research, source-based writing and a language correction. Sources and uncertainties accompany the article.
Review information is loading.
The FBI said on 31 October that North Korea was responsible for stealing more than $6 billion in virtual assets from Binance. It calls the cyber activity behind the attack TraderTraitor.
Binance said its internet-connected wallets were compromised on 29 October and estimated the tokens taken at around $6.3 billion. Blockchain analysis firm Elliptic put the figure at $6.43 billion, more than four times its estimate for the 2025 Bybit hack. It considers the Binance attack the largest known cryptocurrency theft. Neither estimate represents the final net loss.
The FBI said it, the US Secret Service and the IRS criminal investigation division had observed the stolen assets being converted mainly into ether. The agencies asked cryptocurrency businesses to block transactions linked to addresses listed in the FBI alert.
The bureau did not set out its full evidence for identifying the attackers. Chainalysis said it had traced Binance funds being mixed with proceeds from a previous theft at Bitget, which had also been attributed to North Korean actors. Elliptic initially cautioned that the overlap involved only a small portion of the Binance funds and was not conclusive; it later said the connection had grown. TRM Labs separately attributed the attack to TraderTraitor with high confidence, citing information from both on and off the blockchain.
US President Donald Trump said on 31 October that it was not yet certain whether North Korea was involved, Reuters reported. Pyongyang has long denied using state-linked cyber units for theft and revenue. North Korean representatives did not respond to Reuters’ requests for comment on this case.
Binance said on 30 October that it and its partners had frozen about $3 billion in affected assets. Freezing funds can prevent them being moved, but does not mean they have been returned. The exchange later said it had covered about 95% of the affected amount using company resources and funds including insurance reserves. That figure describes replacement assets, not the proportion recovered from the attackers or paid to customers.
After temporarily suspending withdrawals, Binance said it would restore them in phases. Reuters reported that bitcoin withdrawals resumed on 1 November; other assets and networks were to follow.
Binance initially said a compromised employee laptop might have been involved, but subsequently reported finding additional points of breach. Its investigation into the full sequence of the attack continues.
In its initial report on the 29 October attack, the cryptocurrency exchange said an engineer was approached in September through a legitimate job-hunting platform about a role at a fictitious company.
16 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.
During a second interview, the engineer was asked to download a coding assignment onto his work computer. It contained malicious code that ran during installation, Binance said.
The company also described an earlier incident in June, when another engineer downloaded a tampered installation for a developer tool. Its security team replaced the device and changed related credentials, but information about the engineer’s role and colleagues had been exposed, Binance said.
According to the report, the attackers used the first engineer’s compromised computer and an internal AI tool on 20 October to gain control of two other engineers’ devices. One belonged to the employee affected in June and contained a token permitting software deployment. Binance did not fully explain how the AI tool enabled the access.
Nine days later, the attackers used stolen credentials to deploy software and run malicious code, the company said. They gained unauthorised access to a service used to sign wallet transactions and moved assets outside the normal withdrawal process.
Binance suspended withdrawals, but said that alone could not stop all the unauthorised transfers: the attackers had established permissions on the blockchain that operated independently of its withdrawal systems.
The exchange said it has replaced affected devices, decommissioned credentials and rebuilt the internal AI tool. Its investigation is continuing, and it says it is engaging independent cybersecurity experts to review the findings.