ECB plans October review of outstanding bank supervision measures
Frank Elderson says the ECB’s planned review will lighten follow-up on minor bank supervision findings while retaining tougher tools for unresolved material weaknesses.
Review information is loading.
ECB Banking Supervision plans to review its outstanding supervisory measures from mid-October, Vice-Chair Frank Elderson said at a conference in Vienna on 6 October 2026. Banks will receive information on what the review means for their findings and measures. The ECB will consider the severity of each underlying weakness, its relevance to a bank’s financial soundness and the progress made in addressing it, among other factors. [1]
Under the planned approach, the lowest-impact findings, known as F1 findings, will be communicated as supervisory observations rather than generate measures. Low-severity F2 findings and measures may be closed where further supervisory assessment is no longer warranted. Elderson also said mandatory verification by internal audit or internal validation would be removed for low-severity findings related to banks’ internal models. [1]
The changes build on a severity-based approach the ECB began introducing in 2025. Banks can already close low-severity findings themselves, provided they retain evidence for future supervisory reviews. Elderson said lighter follow-up on minor issues would free attention for material risks, without lowering supervisory standards. Where banks fail to address material weaknesses promptly, he said supervisors are making greater use of escalating measures, including capital requirements, business restrictions and periodic penalty payments. [1]
Elderson put outstanding measures across significant banks at around 12,000 at the end of 2025, averaging about 100 per bank and ranging from very low to very high severity. He also said the ECB closed 1,200 more measures than it created during 2025, and that the outstanding stock had fallen by a further 600 in 2026. He did not explain how the 2025 closure figure fits with the reported increase in outstanding measures by the end of that year. [1]
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
About this discussion and AI questions
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…