News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…
Moscow has left open a return to Ukraine peace talks, but the next step under discussion is at technical level, not a confirmed summit between presidents.
Review information is loading.
Russia is willing “in principle” to resume talks with Ukraine and the United States after 10 November, Kremlin adviser Yuri Ushakov said following a meeting between Vladimir Putin and US envoy Steve Witkoff in St Petersburg on Wednesday. The proposed next step is talks between officials, rather than the meeting of presidents raised during discussions in Oslo the previous day.
Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre called Tuesday’s Oslo talks with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, Witkoff and European representatives “good and constructive”. He said Witkoff’s trip to Russia could “possibly pave the way for a meeting at leaders’ level”. Støre said the Oslo discussions covered Ukraine’s security, territory and sanctions, among other issues.
Putin’s initial response sounded less encouraging. Ushakov told journalists that the approaches Witkoff had brought from Oslo contained little that was useful for resolving the war. He later told Russian state television that Moscow was not fully satisfied with the proposals but saw them as a step in the right direction, the Associated Press reported.
In a statement reproduced by Greek broadcaster ERT, Witkoff also called the discussions constructive and said they would continue in three-way talks between the US, Russia and Ukraine at a technical level. “There is still important work left to do,” he said. Zelensky, meanwhile, said he supported a swift return to talks and hoped they could prepare the ground for a leaders’ meeting, according to AP.
BBC Russia editor Steve Rosenberg judged that a summit involving Putin, Zelensky and Donald Trump might not happen soon. That caution does not mean the diplomatic effort has ended: Moscow has left open a return to negotiations, though the timing, venue and participants remain unsettled. Earlier three-way rounds this year produced little reported progress beyond prisoner exchanges.
6 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.