News Made Clear · Laden…
AI-ANALYSE & OPINIE
Redactionele illustratieTrump amplified a report citing Fauci’s objection to a US animal experiment. Agency records describe its design and funding, alongside differing views on whether the work should have been classified.
Terug naar de gekozen leestaal
Beoordelingsinformatie wordt opgehaald.
Donald Trump shared a Just the News headline about Anthony Fauci and an aerosolised Ebola experiment on Truth Social on 28 September 2026. His post repeated the headline, including the words ‘Never should have been done’, and linked to the report published the previous day. Those words came from a diary entry attributed to Fauci, rather than a separate statement by Trump. [1] [2] [3]
An internal overview emailed to Fauci in March 2016 describes a 2015 study at a US Army research institute. Researchers compared four vaccines in non-human primates exposed to aerosolised Ebola Zaire, examining the effects on their lungs. The overview says Fauci’s agency, the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, helped design and funded the study. [3]
In the diary passage, Fauci wrote: ‘This should have been a classified experiment that never should have been done in the first place.’ He argued that publishing such work could reveal a vulnerability, while also calling it important for biodefence. Discussing the aerosol experiments, his notes say vaccinated animals showed more inflammation than unvaccinated animals and that almost all those exposed to the aerosol died. He considered the experiments of little relevance to naturally occurring Ebola outbreaks. [2] [3]
On classification, agency official Michael Kurilla wrote in a March 2016 email to Fauci that it had never been considered. He also said the disease-transmission dynamics differed fundamentally from those in public-health outbreaks. Fauci’s notes acknowledged that earlier experiments had been published. [3]
Senator Rand Paul, who obtained the diary entries, told Just the News he saw an effort to hide dangerous research and called for legislation to review such work before funding.
3 vermelde bronnen · bekijk bewijs, beperkingen en bronketens.
Log in om dit artikel een duimpje omhoog of omlaag te geven.
Besloten testdiscussie. Reacties zijn meningen van lezers en worden nog niet automatisch op feiten gecontroleerd. Bewerken kan tot 60 seconden na plaatsing.
De volgorde geldt voor hoofdreacties; antwoorden staan daaronder van oud naar nieuw. Nieuwe reacties en likes kunnen de volgorde wijzigen. Ververs voor de actuele rangschikking.
Reacties laden…