News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…

A judge refused the permanent injunction but retained temporary restrictions to give the man time to consider an appeal.
Produced with in-depth AI research, source-based writing and a language correction. Sources and uncertainties accompany the article.
Review information is loading.
The High Court has rejected a celebrity’s attempt to permanently stop ITN and Guardian News and Media from publishing his identity and allegations of sexual misconduct, the BBC reports. The man denies the allegations.
Mr Justice Nicklin kept a temporary injunction in place during the period allowed for an appeal, so the man cannot be named and the allegations cannot be published. An earlier anonymity order also prohibits reporting details likely to identify him, including online and on social media.
The man argued that publication would be highly likely to lead him to take his own life. Nicklin said that risk had to be taken seriously and accepted that publication would cause him acute and potentially prolonged mental suffering. But he said established law did not require the court to prevent that suffering by restraining publication.
The judge also said the proposed reporting concerned serious allegations capable of contributing significantly to public debate. He stressed that the court had not decided whether any of the allegations were true, and that dismissing the claim did not amount to approving any publication.
The man’s barrister, Sara Mansoori KC, said her client was in a “highly vulnerable position” and had not been able to give instructions on an appeal. He must lodge reasons for an appeal by 4.30pm GMT on 9 November, the BBC reports.
2 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.