News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…
His father says the force’s account changed over time, while the chief constable has apologised for failing the 18-year-old in his final moments.
Produced with in-depth AI research, source-based writing and a language correction. Sources and uncertainties accompany the article.
Review information is loading.
Henry Nowak’s family have accused police of giving them changing accounts of his final moments and initially portraying him as the aggressor after he was fatally stabbed in Southampton.
In an interview with ITV News, his father Mark said the family were first told that officers had immediately given Henry first aid. He said the account changed over subsequent conversations, until the family learned that the 18-year-old had been handcuffed and arrested.
“The story was evolving every time we had an interaction,” Mark said. He also said police had asked him to approve a draft press release portraying his son as the aggressor while he was returning from identifying Henry’s body.
Henry’s stepmother, Katie Nowak, said she felt the family had been failed repeatedly. She said she feared some decisions may have been made to protect the police and their reputation rather than help the family.
Hampshire and Isle of Wight Chief Constable Alexis Boon told ITV: “I am incredibly sorry that in his final moments, when he needed us most, we failed him.” He said the family had rightly raised serious concerns about the police response and their treatment during and after the investigation.
Henry was stabbed on 3 December 2025. Body-worn camera footage shown at the trial of his killer, Vickrum Digwa, recorded Henry telling officers he had been stabbed and could not breathe. An officer replied: “Don’t think you have, mate.” Police later removed the handcuffs and began CPR.
Mark and Katie said they first saw the footage on the opening day of Digwa’s trial. The Crown Prosecution Service told ITV that it could not share sensitive evidence with the family until the case was trial-ready because of the risk of prejudicing proceedings, and said it had explained that decision to them.
Digwa was convicted of murder and sentenced to life imprisonment in June, with a minimum term of 21 years before time already spent in custody was deducted. The sentencing judge said Digwa’s lies had misled attending officers and influenced their decision to arrest and handcuff Henry. The judge also said a pathologist had concluded that Henry would not have survived his chest wound, however quickly he received treatment.
The Independent Office for Police Conduct told the family in April that it had not identified concerns serious enough to justify disciplinary proceedings against officers at that stage. In July, the watchdog announced that two officers were under investigation for potential gross misconduct. Its investigation is expected to conclude early next year.
A separate independent review into Henry’s murder
5 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.