News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…

Stephen Brearey says he relied too long on hospital managers to act. The Thirlwall Inquiry found executives delayed a police investigation, while his regret raises a separate question about what the doctors could have done sooner.
Review information is loading.
Dr Stephen Brearey, the consultant who raised concerns about Lucy Letby at the Countess of Chester Hospital, says he wishes he and his colleagues had gone to the police sooner. His regret comes a month after a public inquiry concluded that hospital executives’ failure to act on the doctors’ concerns delayed a police investigation by almost a year. [1] [3]
Brearey, who led the hospital’s neonatal consultants, told BBC News he had assumed senior managers would respond to their suspicions. “I was naively thinking” they would see the concerns as he did, he said. Looking back, “we would have gone to the police earlier”. [1]
Letby, a former neonatal nurse, was convicted of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven others. The Thirlwall Inquiry examined how concerns about her were handled, including whether the police should have been informed sooner. [1] [6]
Its report charts several missed opportunities. One consultant said on 29 June 2016 that the police needed to be involved, and senior hospital staff discussed a referral. But the plan adopted the next day did not include contacting them. At a meeting in March 2017, Brearey said, he and a colleague asked chief executive Tony Chambers to call the police. Chambers told the doctors they could do so themselves, a response the inquiry called misguided. The meeting ended with an agreement that the police would be contacted. [2] [3]
A police officer attended a meeting about the deaths in late April, and Chambers wrote formally to Cheshire Police on 2 May. It was after Brearey and two colleagues met officers on 15 May that police decided to open an investigation. The inquiry found that executives had failed to act on concerns raised in good faith and were principally responsible for the delay. Chambers denied seeking to stall or obstruct an investigation; the inquiry rejected his denial.
6 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.
The inquiry made 17 recommendations, including a protocol requiring managers to act promptly on good-faith suspicions of deliberate harm and to follow safeguarding procedures that would involve the police. Brearey told the BBC he believes the proposals, if enacted, would go a long way towards preventing further incidents. What an earlier approach to police by the consultants themselves would have changed remains uncertain. [1] [5]