News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…

Prime Minister Rob Jetten says the Dutch treasury stands to lose billions if parliament rejects the government’s 2027 tax package, which still needs support in both chambers.
What has changed? · 05/11/2026, 01:52 UTC
Produced with in-depth AI research, source-based writing and a language correction. Sources and uncertainties accompany the article.
Review information is loading.
Dutch Prime Minister Rob Jetten has left further changes to the government’s tax plan to the House of Representatives, where MPs can now amend the package. The plan still lacks a majority, and the government says it cannot submit another revised proposal.
The cabinet sent a revised package to the House on Tuesday after extensive negotiations. Jetten said the House had room to steer the plan through amendments, adding that parliament holds the authority to set the budget.
The debate has exposed divisions over how to raise more revenue. Opposition parties PRO and Volt want to add a tax on millionaires. D66 was willing to discuss the proposal, but VVD MP Wendy van Eijk said it was “unthinkable” that coalition parties would vote for it.
The House is due to vote on the tax plan on 12 November. Earlier negotiations over the plan have also centred on tax relief and how wealth should be taxed.
Jetten told MPs during a debate on Wednesday that the government would miss out on nearly €2 billion in 2027 if the plan were voted down, rising to €6.1 billion in 2028, Dutch news agency ANP reported. He put the structural loss in subsequent years at €9 billion.
The House of Representatives is scheduled to vote on the package on 12 November. ANP reported that it was likely to pass the lower house with support from the ChristenUnie, 50PLUS and Group Markuszower. But Group Markuszower, made up of former members of the PVV, has no senators, leaving support in the upper house uncertain.
Jetten said the cabinet could not put forward another revised proposal and that MPs should now suggest amendments. The government had already revised the plan after negotiations with opposition parties.
Differences remain over how to change it. PRO and Volt want a tax on millionaires; coalition party D66 was willing to discuss the idea, but its partner the VVD said it was unthinkable that coalition parties would support the proposal, ANP reported.
5 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.