News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…

UN delegates discussed possible treaties on disaster protection and crimes against humanity, with a planned 2027 conference shaping the disaster talks.
Review information is loading.
At a meeting on 13 October 2026, the UN General Assembly’s Sixth Committee considered two prospective treaties: one on protecting people in disasters and another on crimes against humanity, according to United Nations Meetings Coverage and Press Releases. The account describes discussions towards future conventions, not the adoption of either treaty. [1]
On the disaster treaty, Cameroon’s representative, speaking for the African Group, referred to a General Assembly decision to convene a three-week negotiating conference in 2027. Timor-Leste’s representative, speaking for the Community of Portuguese Language Countries, said it would take place in Bangkok and urged delegations to use the limited time well. [1]
Delegates also set out what they wanted from the negotiations. Saint Kitts and Nevis’s representative, speaking for the Caribbean Community, cautioned against a one-size-fits-all treaty and called for a balance between an affected country’s authority and international cooperation. Brazil’s representative said outside assistance should require the affected country’s consent and must not become a pretext for intervention. Germany’s representative, meanwhile, called for practical provisions on the protection and movement of humanitarian workers. These were negotiating positions, not agreed treaty terms. [1]
In the separate debate on crimes against humanity, Vanuatu’s representative urged countries to address environmental destruction and ecocide. Bangladesh’s representative argued that a convention should focus on preventing such crimes as well as punishing them. [1]
1 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.