News Made Clear · Loading…
According to Arvid Lindblad, Isack Hadjar stands out because he has performed comfortably at Red Bull from the outset. The Racing Bulls driver believes Hadjar has thereby earned early certainty over his contract for 2027.
AI translation of the original article. Independent human translation review is pending. Read the original
Review information is loading.
According to RacingNews365, Red Bull has announced that Isack Hadjar will remain Max Verstappen's team-mate in 2027. The outlet describes the decision as early by the team's standards, with at least nine race weekends reportedly still to go. Arvid Lindblad was also surprised by the timing, but believes Hadjar has earned that certainty through his performances. [1]
The Racing Bulls driver places particular emphasis on how comfortably Hadjar has performed at Red Bull from the outset. In the article published on 24 September, Lindblad tells RacingNews365 and other media that Hadjar is probably one of the first drivers in around eight years to demonstrate that. He initially says ten years, but immediately corrects himself to eight. This is his sporting assessment, not a historical comparison backed by results. [1]
Lindblad's reasoning is that Hadjar has performed well as the second driver and therefore does not need to wait until later in the season for clarity. In doing so, he offers his own explanation for the early confirmation; the article does not discuss Red Bull's own considerations.
For Lindblad, Red Bull's line-up means promotion after his debut season is not on the cards. According to RacingNews365, his own contract for 2027 had not yet been confirmed at the time of publication. Another year of development at Racing Bulls is the outlet's expectation, not an announced decision. [1]
Lindblad himself says he is happy with his development and is focusing on his current season. According to him, talks about 2027 are taking place behind the scenes, but he mentions neither a decision nor a date when news can be expected. [1]
1 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…