News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…

Axel Scheffler has spoken to a German lawyer after seeing AI-generated versions of his characters. He says he wants to protect creators rather than seek compensation.
Produced with in-depth AI research, source-based writing and a language correction. Sources and uncertainties accompany the article.
Review information is loading.
Axel Scheffler says he is seriously considering legal action against artificial intelligence companies over their use of artists’ work without permission.
The illustrator told BBC London he had been in touch with a lawyer in Germany. “There have been illustrators taking legal action against AI companies and I’m seriously considering it. I just want them to stop,” he said. He did not name a company he might pursue.
Scheffler said he was shocked after being shown AI-generated images of his characters in settings including Silicon Valley and Oktoberfest. “It’s clearly my mouse, my Gruffalo, as close as they can do it,” he said, describing the images as a breach of copyright.
The Gruffalo, written by Julia Donaldson and illustrated by Scheffler, was published in 1999. Scheffler is considering action in Germany because he believes the European Union is more favourable to creators. He said his aim was to protect them, rather than seek compensation.
AI companies have argued that using copyrighted material to train models does not necessarily infringe copyright. Intellectual property lawyer Nick Buckland told the BBC that a distinctive character such as the Gruffalo could help Scheffler’s case, but that proving infringement could be difficult.
In a separate case, German publisher Penguin Random House and illustrator Ingo Siegner are suing ChatGPT maker OpenAI over alleged copying of Siegner’s children’s book character, the Little Dragon Coconut. OpenAI told the BBC it was talking to rights holders about supporting creativity while protecting intellectual property and responding to copyright complaints.
3 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.