News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…

A police interview played at Russell Brand’s trial gave jurors the woman’s account of an alleged rape in 2004. His barrister challenged her version of events in court.
Produced with in-depth AI research, source-based writing and a language correction. Sources and uncertainties accompany the article.
Review information is loading.
A jury at Southwark Crown Court heard a woman’s account of an alleged rape by Russell Brand at a birthday party in a Soho bar in 2004. Her video-recorded police interview, made in 2023, was played at his trial on Monday, 19 October. Brand has pleaded not guilty and says any sexual contact, if it happened, was consensual. [1] [3]
The woman told police that Brand grabbed her breasts while they were talking, then pulled her into a lavatory and forced her to perform oral sex. “I just closed my eyes and tried not to be there,” she said in the interview, according to the BBC’s court report. She also said: “I definitely said I don’t want to do this.” [1]
Brand faces seven charges arising from allegations made by six women about events between 1999 and 2009: three counts of rape, three of sexual assault and one of indecent assault. He denies them all. [1] [2]
During cross-examination, Brand’s barrister suggested the woman had willingly accompanied him into the lavatory. She rejected that suggestion. She also told the court that, at the time, she had told friends and family that Brand had grabbed her breasts and pulled her into the lavatory, but that she had got away — an account that stopped short of what she later told police. [3]
4 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.