News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…

Geraint Anderson says London finance rewarded ruthless behaviour, but a psychologist concluded he was not a psychopath. Leadership research offers a limited answer to his wider claim.
Review information is loading.
In a BBC Wales story distributed on 3 October 2026, former City analyst and author Geraint Anderson said he had adopted a harder, more manipulative manner during his finance career because he believed the environment rewarded it. Consultant and forensic psychologist Kerry Daynes, who evaluated him, concluded that he was not a psychopath. She suggested he might have been a “situational psychopath” – her description of behaviour shaped by circumstances, not a separate clinical diagnosis. [1] [7]
Daynes had already published that conclusion in September. In an accompanying first-person account, Anderson said he had previously gone along with the psychopath label in the hope that it would help book sales. He also gave himself a score of about eight or nine on a psychopathy checklist. The checklist’s publisher describes a formal assessment involving an interview and a review of other information, rather than self-scoring alone. [1] [2] [3]
Wider research allows for a limited career advantage, but not a rule that ruthlessness brings success. A 2019 review of leadership studies found a weak positive correlation of 0.07 between psychopathic tendencies and emerging as a leader, but a weak negative correlation of −0.04 with ratings of leadership effectiveness. Its authors also found that moderate levels of those tendencies were associated with higher effectiveness ratings than either very low or very high levels. Those associations do not show whether London finance rewards such traits or whether a workplace changes someone’s personality. [4]
The BBC story says no treatment is available for psychopathy. NHS guidance makes a narrower point about antisocial personality disorder: harmful behaviour can sometimes improve with therapy even if core characteristics remain. In a randomised trial involving 313 men with that disorder under probation supervision, a therapy group had lower aggression scores than a usual-probation group at 12 months. A difference between the groups was not statistically established at 24 months. The trial concerned aggression in that selected group, not a cure for psychopathy.
7 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.