News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…
The Republican’s pledge comes amid a dispute over a similarly named candidate and a federal effort to block certification under certain circumstances.
Produced with in-depth AI research, source-based writing and a language correction. Sources and uncertainties accompany the article.
Review information is loading.
Republican Senator Dan S. Sullivan says he will accept the result of Alaska’s 3 November Senate election even if he loses, despite accusing his Democratic opponent of dishonesty over the recruitment of a similarly named candidate.
Asked on CNN’s State of the Union on Sunday whether he would accept the result only if he won, Sullivan replied: “No, I’m going to accept the election results.” He is seeking a third term against Democrat Mary Peltola.
His pledge contrasts with President Donald Trump’s position: Trump has said a narrow Peltola victory should not be recognised and pushed for a Justice Department lawsuit over the presence of the other candidate, retired teacher Daniel J. Sullivan.
The New York Times reported that Peltola’s campaign was involved in efforts to recruit the second Sullivan. The senator accused Peltola of lying when she said she had not known about the effort, arguing that her staff could not have kept it from her. Peltola has denied knowing about it, and her campaign said it had no involvement in Daniel J. Sullivan’s campaign.
The two men are identified differently on the ballot: the senator is listed as the Republican incumbent, while Daniel J. Sullivan Jr. has no party affiliation. The latter received 2.47% of the vote in the primary, enough to qualify for the ranked-choice general election. That figure does not establish how many people, if any, voted for him by mistake.
On Sunday, a federal judge dismissed the Justice Department’s lawsuit seeking to block certification in certain circumstances pending an investigation of votes for Daniel J. Sullivan. Judge Sharon Gleason said the department had not offered a workable way to conduct such an inquiry while preserving ballot secrecy. The dismissal was on jurisdictional grounds, not a final ruling on the recruitment allegations. The department has filed notice of an appeal, according to the Associated Press.
4 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.