News Made Clear · Loading…
The US central bank is seeking views on plans for reserve backing, capital standards and an application process for banks seeking to issue payment stablecoins.
Review information is loading.
The Federal Reserve Board opened a public consultation on 24 September 2026 on two proposals governing payment stablecoin issuers under its supervision. The plans, drawn up under the GENIUS Act, cover the assets backing those stablecoins, capital and risk-management requirements, and applications by banks seeking to issue them. They are proposals, not final rules. [1]
The first proposal would require issuers to fully back their payment stablecoins with permitted reserve assets. The Board named short-term US Treasury bills and certain other high-quality, liquid assets as examples, rather than providing a complete list in its announcement.
That proposal would also introduce standardised capital requirements intended to address certain credit and operational risks, alongside risk-management standards. The announcement does not specify capital amounts or how they would be calculated. [1]
It would set rules for Board-supervised firms that safeguard assets backing payment stablecoins and clarify which stablecoin and related activities banks under the Board’s supervision may undertake. The release does not identify the activities that would be permitted or restricted.
The second proposal concerns the application process for Board-supervised banks seeking to issue payment stablecoins. Applicants would have to submit a business plan, financial information and other documents. It would also establish procedures for appeals, hearings and final decisions on applications, although the announcement does not set out detailed approval criteria or processing deadlines. [1]
Comments will close 60 days after the proposals are published in the Federal Register—not necessarily 60 days after the Board’s announcement. The supplied release does not give that publication date, so the calendar deadline for responses is not yet established here. [1]
1 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…