News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…
Alicia Kearns has challenged the national security adviser’s position over his wife’s posts. Police have ruled out action over one post, while questions about what she knew remain unanswered.
Produced with in-depth AI research, source-based writing and a language correction. Sources and uncertainties accompany the article.
Review information is loading.
Conservative MP Alicia Kearns has written to Prime Minister Andy Burnham questioning whether Jonathan Powell can remain national security adviser after social media posts by his wife, writer Sarah Helm, about Palestine Action. According to the BBC, Kearns asked whether the government had investigated the posts and whether Burnham still had full confidence in Powell. Her questions raise a concern about sensitive information, but do not establish that Powell disclosed any. [1]
The Metropolitan Police had already decided to take no further action over one of Helm’s posts. Responding on 15 October to a discussion about author Sally Rooney, Helm wrote: “God help us authors who support Palestine and Palestine Action.” Police said specialist officers assessed the post and found that it did not meet the criminal threshold. That decision concerned Helm’s words, not Powell’s handling of information. [1] [3]
A separate exchange sharpened the questions about Powell. In the House of Lords on Tuesday, Conservative peer Lord Callanan said Helm had replied “Nope” when asked online whether her husband was involved in the decision to ban Palestine Action. He asked how she could know. Kearns told the BBC: “We cannot have the NSA’s wife tweeting about what decisions her husband has or hasn’t made.” The reported reply does not establish how Helm arrived at her answer. [2] [1]
Downing Street said Helm did not represent the government. In the Lords, minister Fiona Twycross likewise distinguished Helm’s views from Powell’s role, but did not directly answer questions about how Helm knew of his involvement or whether her posts had been considered in vetting. [1] [2]
The ban on Palestine Action took effect in July 2025. The Court of Appeal has ruled the decision lawful; the Supreme Court has listed a further hearing for 4 and 5 November. [5]
5 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.