News Made Clear · Loading…
The Netherlands and ten other EU countries are asking the European Commission to amend a rule which they say can exclude healthy startups and scale-ups from funding. They believe the latest Commission proposal does not go far enough.
AI translation of the original article. Independent human translation review is pending. Read the original
Review information is loading.
The eleven countries want subordinated loans and other so-called quasi-equity to count as full equity when assessing whether a company is an ‘undertaking in difficulty’ (OIM, the Dutch abbreviation). They have sent a joint request to the European Commission to this end. According to Rijksoverheid, Minister for Economic Affairs and Climate Heleen Herbert took the initiative on 24 September 2026. [1]
That European definition can affect access to grants, guarantees and loans. According to the ministry, the rules are intended to prevent non-viable companies from receiving state aid and thereby creating unfair competition.
But the ministry says the assessment also produces the wrong outcome for financially healthy startups and scale-ups. According to its explanation, the current definition considers only equity; subordinated loans and venture capital do not count. As a result, viable growth companies can still be classified as undertakings in difficulty and miss out on funding. The report gives no figures for the number of companies affected or the sums involved that would allow the scale of this problem to be established. [1]
According to Rijksoverheid, the latest Commission proposal is intended to address the problem from 2027, but does not include the change sought by the eleven countries. They therefore consider the proposal insufficient. This is a request for an amendment, not an adopted new rule.
The subject is also on the agenda of the Competitiveness Council in Brussels on 24 September. Rijksoverheid also announces a meeting between Herbert and EU Commissioner Teresa Ribera, who is responsible for competition. The report gives no outcomes from those talks or any decision on the requested additions. [1]
1 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…