News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…

The FA has introduced three-a-side football for under-sevens, replacing five-a-side in a bid to give children more touches and keep them involved. Coaches have welcomed the idea but flagged practical challenges and concerns about dominant players.
Review information is loading.
The Football Association has replaced five-a-side with three-a-side football for children under seven, aiming to give young players more touches of the ball and keep them actively involved. The change could shape how English footballers learn the game, although its effect on player development will take years to assess. [1]
The FA says the new format follows two years of research with Liverpool John Moores University, which analysed more than 400 matches involving players from under-six to under-14 level. Under the format, three children play without goalkeepers or referees; the games are intended to keep every player active and offer more chances to make decisions and score.
John Folwell, the FA’s head of grassroots coach development, told BBC Sport that research showed players with more touches were more engaged, made more decisions and took part in more physical activity. [1]
The change has brought practical challenges for some clubs. Michael Bland, who coaches Collingham FC’s under-sevens, said the club runs three pitches at once and that a parent’s absence can leave one adult trying to oversee several games. He also raised concerns about self-officiating and teaching children safe tackling. [1]
Another Collingham coach, Mick Goodwin, said a stronger player could dominate a three-a-side game, leaving less confident children with fewer touches. He described the format as promising but in need of refinement. [1]
The FA says the format is designed around enjoyment rather than tactics or competition. Some children and parents at Collingham welcomed the extra space and opportunities to dribble and pass, while one parent said a child accustomed to a more traditional format had needed time to adjust. [1]
The absence of goalkeepers has also prompted concern. Three-a-side lasts for a year, with five-a-side returning at under-eight level. Folwell said the FA did not believe the change would harm goalkeeper development, arguing that children would still practise blocking and positioning, as well as improve their skills with the ball. [1]
1 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.
The FA introduced mini-soccer for under-tens in 1999 to give children more involvement than full-sized 11-a-side matches allowed. The latest change goes further, but it is too early to know whether it will influence the wider development of English footballers. The BBC reports that three-a-side is also used in youth football in Germany, the Netherlands and Norway. [1]