News Made Clear · Loading…
The White House must restore the revoked press passes for fourteen days. Judge Timothy Kelly intervened on procedural grounds. CNN reports that some employees were still denied entry on Thursday morning despite the order.
AI translation of the original article. Independent human translation review is pending. Read the original
Review information is loading.
CNN, MS NOW and Politico have obtained a temporary order requiring their permanent White House press credentials to be restored. Judge Timothy Kelly granted the request on September 24 and directed that the revoked passes be returned and reactivated immediately. The measure lasts fourteen days. [1]
That changes the position since the September 23 hearing, which initially ended without a ruling. There is now an enforceable order, although the lawsuit has not been finally decided. [1] [3]
Kelly finds that the outlets are likely to succeed on their Fifth Amendment procedural due process claim. He cites binding decisions on permanent press passes and the requirement for advance notice and an opportunity to be heard. [1]
The administration did not dispute that these steps had not taken place before revocation. It relied on a subsequent opportunity to respond and on national security. Kelly finds the circumstances in the current record insufficiently exceptional to make a response after exclusion adequate. He also finds no sufficiently established prior standard governing conduct that would lead to revocation. [1]
This is a provisional assessment of the likelihood of success and the need for temporary protection. The order does not finally decide the separate First Amendment claims concerning press and speech freedoms. [1]
According to CNN, reporter Betsy Klein and a photojournalist were still denied entry on Thursday morning, including after 9 a.m. in Washington. One CNN producer was admitted after 6 a.m. CNN also reported refusals involving MS NOW and Politico. That reporting, updated at 9:18 a.m. EDT, does not establish that access had been fully restored. CNN is itself a party to the case. [2]
3 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Kelly rejected the request to delay his order’s effect. During the fourteen-day period, he intends to arrange expedited briefing on a longer-lasting preliminary injunction, based on a fuller record. [1]
The legal protection is therefore temporary. Whether every affected journalist can actually resume working on the grounds also requires checking implementation.
Previously published: [Trump bans CNN. Even Fox News draws the line.](https://www.newsmadeclear.com/en/news/1c99631f-6fbf-4427-8f9c-c2c2ad64ae38).
The new development is the grant of temporary protection. Readers should distinguish the order to restore access, its practical implementation at the entrance and the continuing adjudication of the case. The order establishes the first step; it does not automatically establish the other two.