News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…
Polly Miller-Perkins plans to visit ten training establishments after women alleged sexual abuse at an Army college. The review will look for possible wider welfare and safety problems.
What has changed? · 07/10/2026, 11:27 UTC
Review information is loading.
The review will cover Army, Royal Navy and RAF establishments, including Army Foundation College Harrogate, the Royal Military Academy Sandhurst and Britannia Royal Naval College Dartmouth. Miller-Perkins plans to visit all ten sites in November, speaking to recruits, staff and families. She aims to produce early findings in the new year and says her recommendations will be made public. The ten sites define the review’s reach; they are not ten established cases of abuse. [1]
Four young women told the BBC in August that they had experienced sexual assault or harassment at Harrogate. One said several fellow junior soldiers had raped her. One of the women questioned whether people would speak candidly to a commissioner with a military background. Miller-Perkins, a former air commodore, said trust had to be earned. She said she had been planning the review since the spring and that the BBC’s reporting reinforced concerns she already held. [1]
An earlier Army inquiry found weaknesses in local policies and oversight of complaints at soldier-training establishments. Its reviewing authority later reported that 12 of its 13 recommendations had been actioned and closed; it said at the time that the remaining recommendation would be completed by autumn 2025. Those historical findings do not show whether the same problems persist across the sites now under review. [2]
The Ministry of Defence welcomed independent scrutiny, said unacceptable and criminal behaviour had no place in the military, and pointed to Harrogate’s outstanding Ofsted rating. That rating is confirmed by a March 2026 inspection, which also recorded positive findings on complaint handling and female recruits’ treatment. The inspection assessed the college’s welfare arrangements; it did not determine what happened in the women’s individual cases. [Sources 1, 3]
3 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.