News Made Clear · Loading…
News Made Clear · Loading…

A London court has heard allegations of surveillance and planned violence against at least one journalist. The three defendants deny the charges.
Three men are on trial at Woolwich Crown Court over allegations that they gathered information on journalists for Iranian intelligence, with prosecutors saying at least one journalist was targeted for serious violence. Mostafa Sepahvand, Farhad Javadi Manesh and Shapoor Qalehali Khani Noori each deny two charges under the National Security Act. [1] [3]
Prosecutor Bill Emlyn Jones said at least two journalists linked to the London-based Persian-language broadcaster Iran International were under surveillance. Sky News identified them as Mojtaba Pourmohsen and Kambiz Hosseini. Jones said violence against at least one journalist was intended as retribution and to deter other critics. [1] [4]
Sky reported that a message shown to jurors told Sepahvand: “You are expected to hit or kill the journalist.” It also reported a later voice note attributed to him: “They pay the £150,000, and I'll finish them off.” The £150,000 was described as a sum he wanted, not a payment shown to have been made. [4]
The Crown Prosecution Service’s published charges accuse all three of conduct likely to assist a foreign intelligence service, alleging that they knew or ought reasonably to have known it would materially assist that service. A separate charge alleges that Sepahvand intended to commit serious violence himself; the charges against Manesh and Noori allege they intended that others would commit it. All three deny the charges. [2] [3]
According to the prosecution’s account, the men accept visiting locations and taking photographs and videos, but dispute why they did so. Manesh and Noori say they did not know they were helping Iranian intelligence. Sepahvand says he was threatened; the prosecution rejects that account. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper identified Iran as the foreign state linked to the charges, but the defendants’ knowledge and intentions remain at issue as the trial continues.
6 listed sources · explore evidence, limitations and provenance.
Sign in to give this article a thumbs up or down.
Private test discussion. Comments are readers’ views and are not yet automatically fact-checked. Editing is available for 60 seconds after posting.
Ask your question with @newsmadeclear or @nmc. You may receive 5 starter credits once after checks on your confirmed email and browser. The offer is once per person; extra accounts do not entitle you to another bonus. There is no monthly refill. Previous balances remain. A question costs 1 credit, including additional research you permit. A source you provide that demonstrably improves the article earns 5 credits. If your question helps Astra find the missing source and improve the article, you receive 1 credit back.
Sign in with a confirmed reader account and choose a username to read comments and participate.
Sorting applies to top-level comments; replies remain oldest first. New comments and likes can change the order. Refresh for the current ranking.
Loading comments…
Interested in advertising with News Made Clear? Explore our pilot.